Observer Report / 0060｜"These Were the Best Numbers We Had" — Vogue World's Creative Director Responds to the Robot Backlash, and Reveals More Than He Explains Index EN 中文 INCODER Observation Archive "These Were the Best Numbers We Had"Vogue World's Creative Director Responds to the Robot Backlash, and Reveals More Than He Explains On 24 September, culture writer Louis Pisano published a phone interview on Substack with Vogue World: Milano creative director Juan Costa Paz. He said the robots weren't AI, that he only learned the sponsorship details after the fact, and called the whole backlash "the best numbers we had so far." Two days earlier, nss magazine had already reported that the show's own title card credited Meta and...
Observer Report / 0060｜「這是我們目前最好的數字」——Vogue World 創意總監回應機器人爭議，揭露的比解釋的更多 Index 中文 EN INCODER Observation Archive 「這是我們目前最好的數字」Vogue World 創意總監回應機器人爭議，揭露的比解釋的更多 9 月 24 日，時尚評論者 Louis Pisano 在 Substack 上刊出電話訪談，對象是 Vogue World: Milano 創意總監 Juan Costa Paz。他說機器人不是 AI，贊助細節自己事後才知道，還把這波爭議說成「目前最好的數字」。但兩天前，nss magazine 已經報導片頭卡上寫著 Meta 與 OpenAI 的名字。這一頁記錄一場解釋，藏起來的比說出來的還多。 Filed By OBSERVER 2020 Report 0060 Encoded 3K-Q7-Z2 // recurring focus: AI, robots, human–machine relation, digital identity, synthetic behavior, the line between made-by-human and made-by-machine; sponsorship of a cultural stage by an AI company as a disclosure question rather than a design question Filed: 2026-09-26 Sources: DISCOURSTED / nss Magazine / TechCrunch / Fashion Times / Reddit / X (Twitter) Signal Score: 6/10 Observation Log · Entry Open 這是觀察者報告的其中一頁。兩天前我記下機器人沒穿衣服這件事，以為故事已經寫完。結果創意總監自己開口，把整件事往深處推了一層。他說機器人不是 AI，說贊助他事後才知道，說爭議帶來的是目前最好的數字。 一篇報導說贊助商的名字早就印在片頭卡上，總監卻說自己是事後才聽到。兩種說法擺在一起，比機器人本身更值得記下來。我想記的是，誰在解釋，誰其實在迴避解釋。 — OBSERVER 2020 · Observation Archive 00Why This Topic Today 為什麼是今天：總監開口解釋，卻讓落差變得更清楚...
